Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:02

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Vitamin D: The best time to soak up sunlight without hurting your skin - Times of India
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ground beef sold at national grocery chain might be contaminated with E. coli, USDA warns - AL.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s the craziest thing you’ve heard pretending to be asleep?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Discovery of 100-million-year-old dinosaur eggs reveals life in Jurassic America - Earth.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.